The following is an outright "LIE" put out by Mesosilver:

"High ** particle surface area** makes Mesosilver more effective than silver protein type
products with silver concentrations in the

**Here is the Scientific
"Mathematical" proof that Mesosilver is "LYING":**

These s**cam sites will lie by
inferring 20 paltry (measly) particles of silver have a greater surface
area than 5000 particles! Ask yourself: Do 20 regular compact car
tires have a larger surface area than "5,000" normal family size car
tires? Of course not. But they trick the public by saying and inferring that their
low 20 ppm (parts per million) has more relative surface area
"without" telling the public that Invive "at 5000" ppm has
250 times more surface area than their 20 ppm.**

**Here are the actual
"mathematical" proofs (not just misleading typing and misleading
graphs), that proves "mathematically":**

**Our Invive 5000
ppm has 250 times larger "total" surface area than promoters scam
dishwater paltry 20 ppm:**

**1.) ****The "total" surface area of all 20
pieces of promoters 20 ppm increased surface area = 20 * ****p (.01 ****m) ^{2}
=**

**2.) The
"total" surface area of 1 of INVIVE's .005 to .015
particles is = ****p**** (.01 ****m****)
^{2} = 0.000314 square microns, for a spherical silver particle of
average diameter 0.01 **

**3.) ****INVIVE'S Total particle surface area in one
dose of 5000 = 5000 * ****p (.01 ****m ) ^{2} =**

**4.) INVIVE’S 5000
[particles of silver] ppm silver has 250 times more surface area than promoters
20 {particles of silver] ppm silver**

**5.)
Therefore ****our 5000
ppm has 250 times the effectiveness** of their 20 ppm.
The comparison is for a fixed spherical size of silver particle, since there
are many promoters of silver in the range of 20 ppm.

6.)
Effectiveness can only be compared for a fixed particle size. It is not
true that producing more particles of smaller size to get a greater surface
area for the same ppm of silver will necessarily increase effectiveness.
This is especially true of very small particles, where the **smallest sizes
are ineffective against pathogens**. The silver user should beware of
claims of large surface area at low ppm.

**7.) **To have equivalent surface area to Invive
5000, the promoters would have to manufacture a silver particle size 250 times
smaller at 20 ppm. This is because** "the"** **surface
area relative to the silver mass is inversely proportional to the particle
diameter****. This
would be a particle of 0.04 nm (nanometers) in diameter. Such a size
could not be made, and if it could, is too small to be effective against
pathogens.**

**8.) **Analysis of the silver promoters site for
20 ppm weak silver, has determined that their data is suspect as deliberately
misrepresentative of the facts that their own site presents for the small
particle size they are claiming in their comparison table. Their lab results
state an average size of 18.04 nm **but show a graph implying a size of 0.678 nm** which seems very small and **proves inconsistent via their own data** because the graph is way below
18.04 nm.

**Theirs is an absurd lying
deception that they perpetrate on the public to sell their weak 20 ppm
solution, for while silver-colloids.com is posing as an independent
site, the truth in fact is that silver-colloids.com is owned by the
same person (Frank Keys) who owns the Meso silver company.**

**The above facts and mathematics prove the hoax that
silver-colloids.com and meso silver have perpetrated on unknowing people.**

**Click here to see: Rebuttals to Promoters >> https://www.invive.com/Rebuttals_new.html**

Click here for Video:

Click here on this Home Page box>> to see Invive's "main" Home Page

This site does not sell or distribute personal information.